I would like to discuss the different ways people respond to abstract art and music.  Whilst these two different art forms have many significant similarities, many people tend to approach them entirely differently.  Why is the attitude so different when they encounter examples in each of these mediums?  Consider the possibilities.

Abstract art -- ‘what does it mean?’ I hear

It's not surprising that many people, who are not conversant with the language of contemporary art, become very puzzled when looking at an abstract artwork.  Their confusion is usually triggered by being confronted with an unfamiliar visual experience.  Normally when people come across a painting or sculpture, they are looking for visual references they are familiar with.  Such references may include landscape features, the human body or ordinary objects they see every day.

So when looking at an abstract artwork and their familiar visual references do not come into play, they tend to become confused and bewildered.  They are inclined to ask 'what does this mean?' rather than come to the simple conclusion of 'I like it' or 'I do not like it'.

Why is abstract art and music perceived differently?

t is interesting to note that the very same people would not be confused the same way if they just heard a new musical piece.  Instead of asking 'what does this mean?' they would certainly come to the simple conclusion 'I like it' or 'I do not like it'.

When hearing a new musical piece, people are not making comparisons with the natural sounds they hear in their daily lives, such as sounds heard in a forest, on the beach, in urban settings and so on.  They respond to the mood, the melody and the rhythm of the music instinctively. They either like or dislike the musical piece without resorting to reasoning and analysis or looking for a meaning.  Their reaction is instinctive, intuitive and quite often emotional.  May even play on their heartstrings.
This indicates to me that many people appraise abstract art and music entirely differently.

Music is intuitively assessed and accepted or rejected, as the case may be.  In contrast, visual art is scrutinised with analytical reasoning, and the viewers are usually looking for a logical explanation.  For some inexplicable reason the intuitive approach gets switched off by most people when it comes to contemporary art, especially the non-representational kind.

Music is intuitively assessed and accepted or rejected, as the case may be, however, visual art is scrutinised with analytical reasoning, looking for a logical explanation.  For some inexplicable reason the intuitive approach gets switched off by many viewers when it comes to appreciating contemporary art, especially the non-representational kind.

The parallels between abstract art and music

In this discussion I deliberately have chosen music for comparison.  Even though abstract art and music are treated quite differently, I believe there are very strong parallels between these art forms.  Creators of abstract art and composers of music apply the same principles in their compositions and they rely on the same basic elements.  Their common language is colour, tone, texture, mood, rhythm, harmony, contrast, balance, tension, counterpoint, integrity and so on.

The dynamics of the creative process in both these art forms are directly comparable and the parallels are strikingly similar.  Yet evaluation and 'understanding' of music and abstract art is altogether different.

Why is it so?